Monday, 19 July 2021

Writing by hand


A week or so ago my Google news alert led me to this article: Handwriting Is Better Than Typing When Learning a New Language, Study Finds  

In a study, a group of 42 adult learners were tasked with learning the Arabic alphabet ab initio.  One group wrote it out on paper, another group typed it on a keyboard, and a third group watched and responded to instructional videos.  It was found that the first group, who were writing the alphabet on paper, learned the letters more quickly than the other groups, and also were more able to apply their new knowledge to other areas, for example using the letters to make words and recognising previously unseen words.

The article goes on to say: 
"
The research shows that the benefits of teaching through handwriting go beyond better penmanship: There are also advantages in other areas of language learning. It seems as though the knowledge gets more firmly embedded through writing."

This finding that physically writing on paper benefits and strengthens learning is not new.  A quick Google reveals other similar articles, some dating back 10 years.  Here are some of them, with information pertinent to language learning highlighted:

  • Writing by Hand Boosts Brain Activity and Fine Motor Skills, Study Shows (2020)
    "'
    When writing by hand, you are not only activating the motor cortex to make your hand physically write, but also motor planning aspects of the visual cortex to visualize the letters in your mind, language networks in the central and temporal lobes to actually communicate, and networks associated with reading and spelling,' Wiley [Colbin Wiley PhD] explains. These processes tie into the parts of the brain that have to do with learning and memory."

  • Three Ways That Handwriting With A Pen Positively Affects Your Brain (2016)
    "Handwriting increases neural activity in certain sections of the brain, similar to meditation."
    "Handwriting sharpens the brain and helps us learn....  
    Apparently sequential hand movements, like those used in handwriting, activate large regions of the brain responsible for thinking, language, healing and working memory."

  • Bring Back Handwriting: It’s Good for Your Brain (2019)
    "The fact that handwriting is a slower process than typing may be another perk....because typing is fast, it tends to cause people to employ a less diverse group of words. Writing longhand allows people more time to come up with the most appropriate word, which may facilitate better self-expression."

  • New study suggests handwriting engages the brain more than typing (2020)
    "Researchers noted that the differences between brain activity while handwriting and typewriting were more pronounced for the adults than for the children, but said the findings still 'provide support for handwriting practice providing beneficial neuronal activation patterns for learning.'"

  • Why Cursive Handwriting Is Good for Your Brain (2020)
    "Data analysis showed that cursive handwriting primed the brain for learning by synchronizing brain waves in the theta rhythm range (4-7 Hz) and stimulating more electrical activity in the brain's parietal lobe and central regions. 'Existing literature suggests that such oscillatory neuronal activity in these particular brain areas is important for memory and for the encoding of new information and, therefore, provides the brain with optimal conditions for learning,' the authors explain." 
    "The use of pen and paper gives the brain more 'hooks' to hang your memories on. Writing by hand creates much more activity in the sensorimotor parts of the brain.....A lot of senses are activated by pressing the pen on paper, seeing the letters you write, and hearing the sound you make while writing. These sense experiences create contact between different parts of the brain and open the brain up for learning."
    The same article also cites a study which showed that handwriting may facilitate young children's
    learning to read.

  • Better learning through handwriting (2011)
  • "When writing by hand, our brain receives feedback from our motor actions, together with the sensation of touching a pencil and paper. These kinds of feedback is significantly different from those we receive when touching and typing on a keyboard."
    This article also refers to another language-based study, which had similar outcomes to the one at the start of this post.

  • Why You Remember Things Better When You Write Them Down (2020)

  • "Your memory of handwritten words is tied to the movements required to make each letter. This might be what helps the memory of what we’ve written hang around in our brains a bit longer. Meanwhile, pressing buttons on a keyboard activates fewer areas of the brain, so we forget what we’ve typed faster."
    "This makes perfect sense when you think about how humans first evolved the ability to read and write. The process was highly connected to physical touch as, for thousands of years, handwriting involved carving symbols into rock or pressing them into clay. Our minds and bodies are primed for this kind of physical interaction with the world. But typing is a far cry from creating the shape of each individual letter by hand."

There is clearly a lot for language teachers to consider here.  In the primary classroom, writing in books is done by hand with either a pen or pencil (gaining your pen licence in Key Stage 2 is a rite of passage!).  However, as I've mentioned before, there is a lot of writing and preparation for writing that is not done with pencil and paper.  Will these "writing without a pen"activities be less effective because of the way that the writing is done?  Should children be physically writing earlier in the learning process?

Children begin writing by hand in EYFS (Nursery and Reception), by "writing recognisable letters".  They develop their fine motor skills by learning how to hold a pencil correctly.  This work is then continued into Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, where it forms an integral part of the National Curriculum for English.  

By the end of Year 6 (age 11) children should be able to write "legibly, fluently and with increasing speed".  Handwriting is expected to become automatic by the end of Year 6.  Automaticity means that children can produce the letters without having to think about the process; if they can form letters automatically, they will not have to devote cognitive attention to their handwriting, and therefore will be able to focus more on the task that they are completing.

Many of my Year 6 pupils have beautiful handwriting.  They are taught cursive, via one of the popular schemes such as Letterjoin or Berol, which is explicitly practised most days.  They can write any words to practise their handwriting, and so can write keywords from any subject area, including languages.  Others, though, do not, for one reason or another and despite interventions, have the neat and cursive writing that is required, often choosing to print and sometimes not forming certain letters correctly.  It is worth noting that all the work on handwriting is done in Key Stage 2.  Once children get to secondary school, handwriting does not feature as a skill to be explicitly practised as part of the national curriculum, so it is unlikely that these students' writing will improve.

I have heard that some secondary schools are choosing to do all writing using electronic devices, so that students will not be handwriting.  This, according to the article that I first mentioned, is also happening in schools in Norway and Finland.  This is, I think, overlooking the significant benefits that writing by hand can obviously bring, and the many years of handwriting practice and development that has taken place in primary school.

Friday, 9 July 2021

Languages in the KS2 curriculum in September 2021

 


Yesterday saw the publication of the Language Trends 2021 report.  Its headlines have been widely reported in the press, for example in this article in The Guardian.

The report has found that:

  • during the first lockdown (March-June 2020) language teaching was discontinued in 53% of primary schools
  • during the most recent lockdown (January-March 2021) language teaching was suspended in 1 in 5 primary schools (20%) due to the pandemic, the impact being felt most acutely in more deprived areas.
  • the pandemic exacerbated challenges that schools already experience with the delivery of languages
A year ago, last July, the DfE released guidance for schools preparing to welcome all their students back in September 2020.  Languages were included in the list of subjects that students in KS3 should be learning in Key Stage 3 as part of their broad and balanced curriculum, but there was no mention of languages on the list of subjects for Key Stage 2.  Following consternation among members of the primary languages community, Baroness Coussins, chair of the All Party Parlimentary Group on MFL, clarified the situation, stating in the House of Lords that schools were expected to continue with teaching a language in KS2.  It's concerning to see that in some schools languages have still fallen by the wayside.

Last week, on 2nd July, the DfE published Teaching a broad and balanced curriculum for education recovery.  It's heartening to see that this year languages are mentioned, and indeed have a whole section to themselves:


There is also this section, which makes it clear that children need to be present for all stages of the learning, as gaps in their knowledge will make it difficult for them to progress:

Many children are still withdrawn from languages lessons for interventions, often for English or Maths, and therefore miss the vital small steps of learning that will help them to make progress.  This makes it clear, I hope, that withdrawing children from languages is not ideal.  It's likely to have less of an impact on other subjects:

It's also worth noting that this guidance, although non-statutory, is for all maintained schools, academies and free schools.  It also states that schools should continue to teach a broad and balanced curriculum in all subjects.  Hopefully the teaching of primary languages will pick up again in the 2021-22 year.







Wednesday, 23 June 2021

Should language learners be writing in books every lesson?

 


All teachers of languages have their lessons observed at some time or other.  It might be by Ofsted, by a school leader or by a colleague. It's quite common for a teacher of languages to be observed by someone who is not a language teacher or specialist, and who therefore has little or no knowledge of how a language should be taught.  Over the years I have heard from and about some of this latter group of language teachers (primary and secondary), who have been criticised because the learners did not write in their books during the lesson.  The assumption for some observers appears to be that learners should write in their books in every languages lesson.  Are they right?

I was taught and have always followed the rule that writing in books (not the same as all writing, as I will discuss later) should only take place once aural and oral practice has taken place, and the children's knowledge and understanding of the new vocabulary, grammar, phonics and structures are secure.

Over the last two days I have been searching for some kind of official documentation to back up this rule.  Unfortunately, there is nothing to be found.  However it's certainly worth noting (and thank you to Vincent Everett for pointing this out!) that neither is there any official documentation saying that learners should be writing in books every lesson.

So when should learners be writing, and how should they go about it?  Let's have a look at the evidence and the documentation that we do have.

I'm going to start with the documentation from Ofsted, since, like it or not, their inspection framework influences what we do in the classroom and how other professionals observe and judge our lessons.  Two weeks ago, Ofsted published Curriculum research review series: languages, "a review of research into factors that can affect the quality of education in languages".  Here are two excerpts:



The phrase "over time" is used in both these excerpts.  Ofsted have made clear that they are no longer expecting to see progress made in one single lesson, but are looking instead for planning and evidence of progress across a series of lessons.  As languages professionals, we know that it takes several lessons to introduce and practise thoroughly the new language before it is formalised in writing.  Personally, I can often go three or four lessons without children writing anything in their books.

Dr Michael Wardle, Ofsted's languages lead, said at Language World 2021 that "building blocks in each subject [should be] carefully sequenced and practised until sticky".  In other words, activities should be meaningful, in the right place in the sequence for a purpose.  They should not be tokenistic, which is how I would consider writing in a book every lesson merely to tick a box.  Dr Wardle has also said that the new curriculum and the new Ofsted framework is all about "knowing more and remembering more".  We should only plan a writing activity if it is going to help children to know more and remember more at a specific stage in the sequence of learning.  

There is further evidence on page 2 of the document Ofsted inspection - clarification for schools:

Ofsted recognises that no work in books does not mean that no learning has taken place, and it's clear that this should be shared by observers of any subject, not just languages.

There are, of course, mentions of writing in the National Curriculum programmes of study for languages.  According to the purpose of study for both Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3, a balance between the spoken word and the written word must be struck:


In the aims of the programme of study, again for both key stages:

In Key Stage 2 subject content, we are required to offer a balance of oracy and literacy:

The word "appropriate" is crucial here - a writing activity must be appropriate to the sequence of learning and not just there because there is an expectation that writing in books must be done.  

We can also refer back to the Key Stage 2 Framework for Languages (a sadly technically obsolete but still very useful document, available here) for additional guidance as to the place of writing in the sequence of learning:


The inference here is that children will begin a unit of learning with speaking and listening, which will later be reinforced and further developed by reading and writing.  Oracy is seen as a foundation for literacy, in other words it comes first, and children move on to literacy when it is appropriate to do so.


Written work, therefore, is down to the judgement of the teacher, taking into account the age and experience of the children in the class.  It does not mention written work being done every lesson.  It's always important to consider the "big picture of learning", where you are in the sequence, and whether it is appropriate and meaningful for children to write formally (writing in books can be considered formal writing) at this time.

This further section from the Key Stage 2 Framework brings me to my next point:


On Twitter yesterday I had a response to my question from Ruth Swailes, an expert in the early years of education:

This alludes to James Britton's quotation from 1983: "Reading and writing float on a sea of talk", and the links to this can be seen clearly in the national curriculum for English for Key Stage 1 and lower Key Stage 2.  We always need to bear in mind how our learners have been taught previously, in primary as well as secondary, and to incorporate elements of those previous experiences in our lessons.  

Among the statutory requirements of the Year 1 (age 5-6) English curriculum are:


and in Year 2 (age 6-7), children should be taught to:


This is then extended into lower Key Stage 2 (Year 3 and Year 4, age 7-9), where children should be taught to:


In English, then, children are taught to discuss their compositions orally before recording them with a pencil and paper.  This strategy is good practice for language learning, and has also found its way into the primary languages classroom via Pie Corbett's popular Talk For Writing.  I would surmise that there are some English lessons in lower primary where writing in books does not take place, but where there is much discussion and rehearsal of what will be written at a future time.

As Janet Lloyd says, writing or composition can often be an invisible activity that doesn't actually involve physically scribing:


In the languages classroom we build up the learning gradually via a series of carefully planned activities.  We often show the written word early on, to assist us with sound-spelling link and phonics - we want learners' first stored image of the new word to be the correct one, and not one that is affected by English phonics.  We explicitly practise spelling via strategies like writing in the sky.  We might use sentence builders to drill the new vocabulary and the way in which it fits into our sentences.  We might "write" initially using letter cards or word cards, which are less threatening in the early stages and can be easily edited.  We also try out our first writing on mini whiteboards, which, again, can be easily edited.  Writing in books is often the last step, the summative activity, once everything else is secure, once children are confident with the new language and proficient in its use.

So, what is the answer to my initial question?  Should language learners be writing in books every lesson?  No.  Absolutely not.  Writing should take place at an appropriate and carefully planned point in the learning, as a meaningful step towards the objective.  If that means going several lessons without writing in books, so be it.  

If absolutely necessary, there are other ways of recording that the learning has taken place (although Ofsted have said that they don't expect to see it):
  • take photos of children speaking and stick it in their books
  • video children or record children speaking, attach it to a QR code and stick the QR code in their books
  • stick a sticker in the books on which is recorded the learning that has taken place
  • children complete a peer test or check activity, record the result on a post-it, and this is stuck in the book.

Friday, 18 June 2021

Let's play darts: an update

 



Last weekend I wrote about the dartbard writing activity that I had learned about via Twitter.  This week I tried it for the first time with my excellent Year 4 class.  We have done a lot of work this year on opinions of foods and drinks, and are now working on the weather.  The children are revisiting and recycling their knowledge of opinions to talk about opinions of weather.

The children said that they enjoyed the activity, and particularly enjoyed the challenge of remembering and looking for the correct words and phrases.  I asked them to do as much as possible from memory, and if they had to check the answers to note at the bottom of the instructions what they had used (they have a sentence builder and a knowledge organiser).

I divided the questions into 4 quarters of complexity, as I had suggested in my previous post.  The coloured-in dartboard on this child's work shows me very clearly that she needs a bit more practice of the more complex sentences, in particular with working out whether a singular or a plural opinion is needed.  I was really pleased to see that she had corrected her work as she checked it.

One thing I would say is that the accuracy of the marking by many of the children left a lot to be desired!  Particularly with things like me gusta vs me gustan, they hadn't checked the spellings carefully enough, and hadn't checked their definite articles.  Next lesson we will be practising checking our own work very carefully and talking about the difference that spelling errors and missed out words make to grammar and therefore meaning.

When I displayed the answers for the children, I displayed this grid and left them to it:


I think next time I will animate the answers to appear one by one, and talk the children through the things that they should be looking out for when checking their work.

I hope this helps you if you are thinking of having a go at this activity!


Sunday, 13 June 2021

Let's play darts!

 



This morning I took part in #ShareStuffSunday on Twitter, offering minibooks, making a flag and the LiPS Listening Project.

I had a look through the other tweets, and was very interested in this one from the multi-talented Jasmine Kay (have a look at her Etsy shop!)



I could see straightaway that this was something that could be easily adapted to use in the Languages classroom.  Indeed, Jasmine says that she has used this activity in her French teaching.  I can see it being used for things that need drilling, in other words for phrases or sentences which are repetitive in structure.  It could be another activity to do using sentence builders.

I like how the completed dartboard will provide quick feedback to the teacher as to how many questions each child has got right, and children will like it as it involves colouring in!

For differentiation purposes, children could try to complete the questions without support, and could look at their books, wall displays or knowledge organisers for support.

Thinking about what my classes are doing at the moment, I've made a example of the dartboard activity for my Year 4 unit ¿Tienes hambre?



For further feedback for the teacher, I've used four different levels for the questions, and use a quarter of the dartboard for each level:

Level 1: 1, 18, 4, 13, 6
Level 2: 10, 15, 2, 17, 3
Level 3: 19, 7, 16, 8, 11
Level 4: 14, 9, 12, 5, 20

It should be easy to see at a glance which quarter and therefore which levels children have coped well with.